Introduce new tax code for state pensioners with double the personal allowance
- Parliament:
- 2024–present
- Signatures:
- 119,206
- Responded:
- 9 Dec 2025
- Department:
- HM Treasury
The petition
We want the government to introduce a new tax code for state pensioners, set at double the basic threshold. If this was implemented, pensioners would receive a higher tax-exempt limit, but wealthier pensioners would still pay tax.
We think that people with small private or workplace pensions are currently being taxed unfairly.
The government's response
The State Pension is the foundation of support for pensioners. The Government is committed to a fair tax system but doubling the Personal Allowance for pensioners would be untargeted and costly.
The State Pension is the foundation of support available to pensioners. The government is committed to the Triple Lock – one of the most generous State Pension uprating mechanisms in the world – for the duration of this Parliament. This will increase the basic and new State Pension by 4.8% next April, boosting pensioner incomes by up to £575 a year and strengthening retirement security.
The Personal Allowance is already the highest amongst G7 countries. Doubling this allowance for all pensioners would be costly and untargeted – disproportionately benefitting higher income pensioners.
As announced at the Budget, the government will ease the administrative burden for pensioners whose sole income is the basic or new State Pension without any increments so that they do not have to pay small amounts of tax via Simple Assessment from 2027-28, if the new or basic State Pension exceeds the Personal Allowance from that point. The government is exploring the best way to achieve this and will set out more detail next year.
HM Treasury
Highlighted: the sentence the model picked as the strongest evidence cited.
Debate
Debated in Parliament on 15 Jun 2026. This is shown for context and is not part of the assessment.
Of 5 MPs who spoke in their own right, 3 were for the petition, 2 neutral and 0 against. The government's response: declines.
- For
- Neutral
- Against
Show as a table
| Group | For | Neutral |
|---|